On Earth, as it is in Heaven? – BDSM in perspective

Friday, July 5, 2013

“On Earth, as it is in Heaven?” is part of the series on BDSM and religion


Introduction
The question mark in the title is already indicating that expectations may not be as easy to be fulfilled as we perhaps hope for. BDSM fantasy requires work and the right perspective.

In this blog we look into the reality and imperfection of BDSM. It is perhaps not what some of us expect BDSM to be, but as any human activity it is only as good as those who participate in the game. The right mindset is the first step on the path to bliss.

(Note: This blog entry will be a tad demanding, not only regarding my use of ‘sacred texts’, but also intellectually.[i] It is never a shame not to know or understand something. And this blog is for you to learn, but it is not a test. Take from it what you need.)


Heaven on earth?
The ‘Kingdom of the Lord’ is to come. That is what we learn in Sunday school; that is what the western Judeo-Christian religious traditions tell us and that is what many of us believe: our reward lies in the future.[ii] But is this indubitably true? Can’t we have a tidy bit of ‘heaven’ before we die? And - as we are in a kinky blog here - is it also true for us? Can we – ‘perverts’ – ever experience the bliss we hope for? Can’t we already just be in heaven for a little while and forget the troubles that drag us down to earth?[iii]

It depends; the key will be the perspective that you use. If we take the ‘Kingdom to come’ literal; the greek verb for ‘come’ can be translated as ‘let-her-be-coming’.[iv] This is not the place for an exegetical digression, so it suffices to say that there is a notion of expectation and becoming to it. Ultimately it is made clear elsewhere in the gospel, that the Kingdom of Heaven is a virtual one, as where the rules are abided the spirit of the Kingdom is present. This was meant and understood as here and now, not only later …

For those who are familiar with my ideas about the Dominion of Lord Cameron, this idea will be known. For our current case, we can pursue in this line and by allegory – an ancient way of interpreting religious texts - accommodate it to our praxis: it will be a virtual, evolving, kingdom, characterized by both inner commitment and outer behaviour, but the inner attitude is most important, as it is a Kingdom of the Heart.

In this sense, the well known phrase from the Lord’s Prayer - ‘your will be done, on earth, as it is in heaven’ - for sure has its appeal to every Master. And even when this verse only appears in Matthew and not in Luke’s gospel[v], it is nevertheless clear, that as Masters, Tops or Dominants, we demand attitudes and actions from our slaves, bottoms and subs that we easily recognize as religious in nature; obedience, worship and awe. Which represent the clay with which we build our kingdom, our little mirror.

And because we realize the deeper meaning, we fancy that we are really strict Lords, benevolent Masters, obedient servants and revering slaves. And as such, we naturally deserve the best Lords and the most devout subs. So we go out and seek to find them.


Giving is better as taking – but why does it have to be so hard?
Unlike the most gifted pick-up artists the average kinky gospel is not an easy ‘seek and ye shall find’ but rather turns out to be a series of trial and error. At the end you might have given much and received little, perhaps not even enough to make it worth while. As discouraging as this may sound, it is nevertheless true in many cases; you invest, give and hope; in return you have some nice scenes, hot sex perhaps, but not even close to what you have been looking for. What now?

Yet, as we are all very different beings, all with different urges, sexual orientations, different genders, strangely diverged sexual roadmaps, it will be hard to find a key that will fit on all locks. But we will try, nevertheless. To this I have three points:

First, most of us are still learning about themselves; we are ‘under construction’ and so are your partners. To know what you really want and seek is your real challenge, as often we are fooled by our own dreams too. Eventually, the proof of the pudding is in the eating and don’t forget that while you develop, your own taste may change too.

Second, the ‘seek and ye shall find’ is not the whole story. In fact the whole phrase is a bit larger: “Ask, and it shall be given to you. Seek, and ye shall find. Knock, and it shall be opened to you” (Matt. 7:7).

So we find that we should first ask in order to be given. Not only ask the Devine or yourself for permission, but most prominently, ask your partner(s). Simply asking for what you can mean for them, might be the first step. When you then seek together, you will find. If and for how long that what you find is the real thing, is up to you and your partner(s) to decide. But if you persistently try, ask, seek, your determination will become like knocking on the door and eventually it will open up to you.

Thirdly, BDSM fantasy requires work and the right perspective. Above we have seen bit about the part on working on yourself; your ideas, your ideals, your idols, as well as the work involved in order to get a partner and then keep hir[vi] with you. I am sure many of you have been cruising the web or the local clubs and bars to find someone to whom you would be attracted to and that wanted to experience physical pleasure with you, so it would bring your energy level up a higher scale, feeling good, desired and attractive.


But what about that perspective you ask?
Good one! Yet, as you have been reading, we have seen quite a few perspectives; your imagination, your real needs, your partner(s) wishes and your mutual efforts, the motivations why you dream, fantasize, act and justify. Particularly this last one is not to be underestimated, as justifications for what we do – either good or bad things – is a powerful concept that is towering over us, like a safeguard or watchman.

As we are in a continuous process to develop ourselves - by learning, doing, thinking, seeing and sharing - we follow goals and ideas regarding the direction our maturation takes. And then predominantly the idea that we might grow in the wrong way or by the wrong means is scary. Particularly with non-kinky people, you often are confronted with the idea that BDSM is limitless, uncontrollable aggression, addictive in nature and will end up bad for all those involved.

Well, this is certainly not a perspective that is very helpful, as it is based on a fear of an uncontrollable mixture of sex and violence, like the idea of the victims of vampires that get enslaved to the love bite, because it gives them devastating orgasms.[vii]

Admittedly there is this side to BDSM, but as an umbrella term BDSM is very wide, and only a small part of it has to do with violence or pain. All of it however, has to do with fun. But when it would be about fun only, does it not render us a bunch of hedonists?[viii]

Perhaps, but for most kinky persons, BDSM or leather is much more as just fun; it is a part of our sexual roadmap, a way of dealing with ourselves and others, a way of self-exploration and perhaps even a spiritual goal in itself. And for those who had not expected this, I will argue in the next paragraph what it means to be in heaven.


Between Saturn and Neptune lies … heaven
Beside being called after Roman Gods - Saturn for Agriculture, Neptune for the Sea – both planets are in the sky, or heaven. The planet between them is Uranus, the only planet called after the Greek God of the Sky, Ouranos, which is also the word (ouranois) that the New Testament uses for ‘heaven’.

The idea behind this connection between planets and religion is to be found in the belief that the heavenly bodies and the stars have some form of significance for our life. In a figurative sense humanity throughout history has turned its eyes towards the heavens and expected blessings, aid and forgiveness from ‘above’.

I take it that this was not understood in a literal sense, but that the heavens symbolically stood for our expectations, our hopes, our beliefs. To be in heaven in this sense would not mean to be in a particular place, like a planet, but rather applied to our attitude, a mind set or an experience. Shortly said, heaven is a mental condition.

At the beginning of the blog we have seen that the Kingdom of Heaven has to be understood as a virtual Kingdom too, an inner condition that existed in a group sharing the same beliefs and spirit. Similarly, I understand the orgasm; it is that place everyone is happy; it is therefore a sacred and blessed place that should be cherished; alone with your favourite fantasy, or with others, joined in haunting embrace.

This is the perspective I favour for BDSM; as acts and actions that are aimed at enjoying our blessings in a way that both find ritually adequate and rewarding. It is a perspective of enfolding our sexuality, which was reduced to mere ‘physical’, towards the full plane of human experience, from procreation to imaginative construction.

Love is often seen as the highest moral virtue, and it perhaps is, but also other virtues contribute to our heavenly state; trust[ix], beauty, acceptance, respect, power, communion, technique, sensitivity, self-realisation and energy exchange.


Conclusions
Concluding we can say that this was a different blog; an attempt to lift BDSM out of the mundane, sick and secret sphere, to the place where it rightly belongs; its rituals are profound, rewarding and effective in bestowing us with the sense of feeling whole and guarded.

For all of you I wish that you will consider this perspective, even when it is a tough job and a narrow path. Believe it, go for it, take it and rejoice in the gift of life.


Sincere greetings from the Chapel of the Dominion Court,

Sir Cameron


Endnotes



[i] As any text, a ‘sacred text’ is also a historical one, written by persons in their words and in the context of the time they lived in. We can, may - and perhaps should - ponder on such texts. By using a text that is considered ‘sacred’ or ‘inspired’ I wish to acknowledge the text as relevant for our culture. We may not agree on what the texts mean – whether it is to be seen as a narrative, a revelation or simply as biased opinion - but we agree that it is – to a certain extend – relevant.
[ii] For this reason some say that Christianity produces masochists: we accept suffering, our inferiority and guilt, in exchange for being forgiven and the promise that in the after life we will be rewarded. However, this view may be insulting for Christianity, as not all of Christianity is bad or fundamentalist in their dogmas. Nor are masochists – our masochists – suffering against their will or because of their inequities, nor are our masochists inferior or guilty. Our masochists are the brave, courageous heroes, that we respect, admire and love, just as they respect, admire and love their masters. Amen.
[iii] Yes, we can. Sexuality, romance, love; it is part of us and meant to enjoy, embrace and practise in good spirit, seeking each other and with respect to it’s natural limits. Heaven is of course used in a figurative sense. So seen the above is only a part of the heavenly goods: present for our pleasure, but no goal in itself.
[iv] For the kinky theologians amongst us: ‘elthetoo’ has the imperative mood, second aorist tense, active voice, singular. I translate the Kingdom with her, as basileia is female.
[v] It are with certainty not Matthew’s or Luke’s gospels at all, as all four gospels (selected from amongst 30+ others in a later century) are only attributed to them in a much later period (likely 100 years after Christ’s crucifixion).
[vi] Him/her= hir, his’/her’s= hirs, she/he= sie, hirself
[vii] Are there submissive vampires too? Devout little devils, enchanting witches?
[viii] Hedonism is a school of thought that argues that pleasure is the only intrinsic good. In very simple terms, a hedonist strives to maximize net pleasure (pleasure minus pain). Source: WikiPedia
[ix] Trust or belief are the same word in greek ‚pistis

Real or virtual – BDSM in a modern world

Wednesday, July 3, 2013

“Real or virtual” is part of the series on BDSM and society


Introduction
Is virtual BDSM fake? How can the internet be of assistance to the leather lifestyle? How do kinky people live? Are they open in their role or underground?

This time we take a look at the results of a small survey in order to find out something more about BDMS in regard to relationships and the internet.


Poll on Kink-in-Real-Life
In a recent opinion survey that I performed in the BDSM scene I asked a sampling of kinky folks: "Which is the challenge for your BDSM-lifestyle today – finding a suited partner, living with how you are, keeping your development going, online BDSM or other issues?"


Relationship challenges
In reply, over 5o percent of the interviewed kinky folk deemed relationships the greatest challenge. Persons with a medium appearance, or (severe) overweight more often had a troublesome relationship or even none at all. Persons of medium age (midlife) more often had relational issues as younger or older persons. They also more often had a vanilla partner. Good looking persons and switches seem to have fewer problems or are better in managing them. There was not found any relevance with regard to gender or sexual orientation.


Showing the kink
About one third lived their BDSM openly, leaving two thirds of the questioned with publically hiding their kinky urges. I found no differences with regard to being monogamous or polyamory, nor regarding sexual orientation. Transsexuals and woman more often show their BDSM urges in public.

None of the persons with a vanilla spouse or partner was able to openly show their kinky urges, which makes it likely that there is pressure from their partner to keep it hidden. Whether a person’s partner knows about their kinky urges or not seemed not of great influence on their relationship, but this may be a coincidence.


Online BDSM play
Around one third of the interviewed had some form of online BDSM scenes, with bottoms weighing in at 66 percent and tops and switches at 17 percent each. I assume that online play offers great possibility to try things out in an anonymous and save way. Remember that an alarming 1 on 3 kinky persons expressed to have experienced a consent violation while being with ‘offline’ contacts, which is not very encouraging to put your health and safety at stake (see: http://theclothedlie.blogspot.de/2013/05/bdsm-and-public-acceptance.html).

Of those involved in online play, about the half of them was a novice in BDSM. The more experienced a person gets in real play, the less interest they show in online play. Of course all persons used the internet for information, communication with or searching for partners. Overall online sexual acts or BDSM was not seen as fake or inferior, but as limited by its virtual character; most of us, eventually, need skin on skin.


Technicalities
This survey had a limited number of participants so it likely is not significant for the whole BDSM population. Yet, as it is all based on true, reliable information from existing persons, it nevertheless shows us interesting things.

As I interviewed all the persons in a conversation, I was able to gather a lot of extra information, so here we go:


Sexual roadmap

Gender: females (50%), males (41%), ts/tv (9%)
Sexual orientation: heterosexual (64%), bi-sexual or same-sex (36%)


Relationships

Current relation: Good (50%), None (32%), Difficult (9%), Bad (9%)
from which monogamous (77%), polyamory (23%)


BDSM preferences

BDSM Position: Bottom (41%), Switch (36%), Top (23%)
Urge: Sub (45%), Fetishist (23%), Sadist (14%), Maso (9%), Dominant (9%)

Skills: Experienced (41%), Medium (32%), Novice (27%)
Plays: Regularly (36%), Infrequent (36%), Never (18%), Seldom (10%)


Comments
(1) The stunningly high 50+ percent figure of kinky persons having problems in the relational sphere, confirms the analysis I offered in my former blog on ‘BDSM and public acceptance’ from May, that "it is thought that almost 85% of the people that are not in the BDSM lifestyle do think that there is something wrong with kinky persons." In half of the cases of the troubled relation, there is a vanilla partner. In 75% of the cases the kinky person is a submissive, whereas the gender plays no role. Particularly the group of persons of medium age seem vulnerable to getting involved in a midlife crisis, where it is to be seen if this is BDSM related at all.

Preliminary we could conclude that medium aged submissives are more vulnerable to having a not so good relationship or none at all, compared to other kinky persons.

(2) Those that are into BDSM often start with gathering information online and from books and find groups of people that can offer support. The more experienced one gets, the less interest is shown in chatting or exploring the topic; real meetings are then favoured over online contacts. An exception is made when the partner does not know about their BDSM urges. In general two thirds of those who play out some form of BDSM over the internet hide their urges from their partner.

(3) A small number of persons had problems with being as they are. This had partly to do with their past (broken relationships, religious trauma) or had to do with the transgender or polyamory issue. So seen; most interviewed persons had not problems with being kinky, as such. For those who had problems with kink as part of their lives, such problems were more of social nature, as of a sexual nature.


Conclusions
Concluding we can say that the internet partly took over the function of local BDSM support groups and is well suited to find others kinky persons, gathering information on BDSM and online purchase of play tools. It is of course less suited to gather actual physical BDSM experience or learning technique; for that we need to go out in the wild and meet, practise and learn with and from others.

One major issue not investigated in this blog is the alarming number of wanna-be’s and fakes on the web, or the lack of manners in online chats. After all, with our ‘friends’ on social media platforms, more often as not, we do not have any warrant for the accuracy of the supplied information. I am sometimes under the impression that fantasy is taken for real and is mixed up in stories in a way that goes against the sound and sane parts of our BDSM creed.

Not able to do a survey with thousands of people, I opted for a quality approach with real people involved in the real thing. The results may not be quite representative for the mass, but it is at least the reality of those that I questioned and as such the real deal (for them).

For all of you I wish that you belong to the happy 50% that are living their BDSM urges in an accepting environment and within a functioning relationship. For the less lucky, keep on searching for people that will support you, offer you practise or technical development and help you to stay safe and cool.

Greetings from the statistical office of the Dominions Court,


Sir Cameron

Experience over perversion – How sick is BDSM?

Monday, July 1, 2013

“Experience over perversion” is part of the series on BDSM and psychology
  
Introduction
Is kink normal, is the missionary position normal, is the way we look at the world normal? You may answer ‘yes’ to all of these questions or perhaps not, but in a way we all sense that the answers are depending on your beliefs, your culture or your experience. In this blog we take a closer look at how BDSM became pathologized in the past and why this is now scientifically regarded to be a gross mistake.


Sick persons, sick morals, sick methodology
Most of us will likely not know why the thought that masturbation - instead of being healthy and normal – was regarded as ‘wrong’, but this seemed rather easy to answer: it is not something that we abundantly find written down in religious texts - for as far as I know there is not much on the topic in the Bible. When I was searching for the reason behind this negative attitude towards masturbation I crossed an amazing story.

It all begins at the end of the 19th century in several mental asylums. They were visited by the German-Austrian psychiatrist Richard, Freiherr von Krafft-Ebing who noticed that 98% of the mentally ill inmates did masturbate; from this it he concluded that masturbations either was a symptom or perhaps even the cause of their illness. Krafft-Ebing also suggested a link between masturbation and homosexuality.

As incredible as this story sounds to us now, we can only say that it was a matter of bad luck that this psychiatrist apparently did not masturbate himself, as this would have likely had lead him to quite another conclusion about its healthy and pleasurable effects.

But there is more misfortune in the air, as this doctor, did not only labelled masturbation as a disease, but also other sexual behaviour that was not conform the prudent Victorian moral code, particularly male sadism and masochism. (Female kinky and fetish behaviour were not included in the survey, as Krafft-Ebbing regarded woman as sexually passive).

In 1886 his ‘Sexual Psychopathy: A Clinical-Forensic Study’ appeared, containing around 200 case histories of human sexual behaviour and the work soon became the standard with regard to sexual perversion.

Wikipedia states that “it became the leading medico–legal textual authority on sexual pathology” and - while written in an academic style - developed into a “forensic reference book for psychiatrists, physicians, and judges”. As one of the first scientific book on sexual pathology and same-sex relationships it attracted a lot of attentions. Remember that there was not much pornography available and that people where likely as curious about sex as we are today.

From an evolutionary point of view, sexuality only functioned for procreation, a view that was shared by the church doctrines. Therefore any sexual activity outside of the holy matrimony was regarded as morally flawed, just as recreational sex.

When Freud connected the several stages of sexual development with our mental health, it became clear that sexual deviation mainly was due to childhood trauma. And this and similar theories have been hanging around ever since and caused great harm, disrespect and rejection towards alternative sexual praxis, often leading to situations that show resemblance to the witch-hunts.


Problems we meet
Depending on where you live, your culture may have stringent or looser views on BDSM and same-sex relationships. Area’s we likely will meet a negative attitude or actual resistance are:

- Religious institutions
- Neighbourhood
- Working place
- Children

The idea is that when we are sexually defiant, we are unable or unworthy to participate in religious rituals, social interactions or raising or working with children. However, the functioning of kinky and LGBTQ persons in reality, does show that there seems no reason to suggest that they suffer from a mental disease.


Problems rather by thoughts, as by deeds
Again we see that theoretical prejudges and abstract values are chosen above life-based experience: in scientific terms we would call this a delusion in order to avoid getting on terms with evidence. Whereas for an evaluation of whom we are as a person, our deeds should be taken into account and not our theories about how persons should ideally be; as long as we consent, keep our sexual acts private and respect the public space of others, there is nothing anti-social in what we do.

Notice that we are not claiming that others are not entitled to their beliefs; they are, but so are we. We do not reject, ridicule or forbid the type of sex that the majority seems to prefer, and neither do we force our views upon them, obliging them to follow our sexual preferences. Meanwhile we battle wrong convictions about what it is what we do and enjoy, just like any sensible person would stand up for the right to be yourself.


Conclusion
Concluding we can say that it is not by our deeds that we get problems in the above mentioned areas, then as long as no one knows, everything seems to work fine. Yet as soon as our deeds are being contrasted with differing opinion with regard to sexual ethics, we run the risk of being pathologized. As there is no compelling argumentation for such ethics, we cannot let that happen. Understanding the mechanisms behind pathologizing us, will help to debunk them and set us free.


Afterword regarding religious morality
For about 1800 years amongst those confessing to the spiritual values and truths that can be found in Christianity were many that held slaves. The slaves were used for work, public and private service as well as for sexual service. Slaves were commodities without rights and such slavery was nowhere near the consensual, nurturing and mutually beneficial kind of slavery that we find in BDSM relationships. Rather it showed the unequal, unjust and exploitive side of slavery, a way that devalues the slave instead of empowering them. Regrettably, there was not much theological resistance against the praxis, but eventually reason prevailed.

Bringing an end to abusive slavery was of course a humane act and I think an act that is in accordance with the commandment to love your neighbour. It was a good development and I wish such developments would also occur with regard to the sex-negative attitude that we find in many branches of Christianity. Reality shows that there is nothing wrong with the actual loving of our neighbours, even when this loving occurs in a sexual context.


The truth will set us free – Sir Cameron

Outing or underground? – Similarities between BDSM & LGBTQ

Monday, June 24, 2013

“Outing or underground?” is part of the series on BDSM and society


Introduction
Imagine that you would be fully accepted as you are. That would be great, wouldn’t it? Can you sense how strong, relaxed and sheltered you would feel, if you did get the support of those you love? And there is nothing wrong with aspiring this: it is perfectly normal to wish to be accepted and cared for just as you are. Unfortunately, for the most of us kinky folks - and for quite a few LGBTQ as well - our every day reality is sometimes quite different: we are faced with rejection, pathologizing and on occasion even threats.

What does this mean to us? What does this mean to you, as a kink, aLGBTQ or both? Well, belonging to a not accepted group is tough and for that reason some of us are forced to stay underground and keep an essential part life hidden and wrapped in the cloths of secrecy. In this blog we look at hidden truths and naked lies. Living a double life, by sheer necessity or by our own choice, is in a way a distortion of reality; of how you really are. In this particular blog we search for approaches on how to choose the way that offers most benefits for you, in being yourself. I am sure you have earned it. Absolutely.


Is kink a private matter?
Depending on who you ask inside the leather scene, kink is either regarded a private matter – after all, how you prefer ‘it’ is really none of their business – or, on the contrary, it is definitely something that belongs to their public profile. Like that Harley Davidson driving Master clothed in thick black leather and piercing through you with his demanding eyes. It is obvious what he wants and clear that he will get it.

Which of the two above options is the best, one or two lives, is hard to say; it will depend on your character and the context you live in; is your community, your culture and your relationship open for you outing your kink, or not? Staying underground or outing yourself is nothing but a consequence your own choices, given the circumstances you are in. It is up to you and your living environment how you can live.

When I live in a relationship with a vanilla partner, I show more reluctance about displaying the true role that kink plays in my life. When I play with kindred folk, I let more of it out. This is not only a matter of ethics, but just as much a sign of respect for your partner(s); give to each of them, what belongs to them in the way they wish it. And in return you may expect to meet a similar kind of openness, as meeting respect and openness with respect and openness is normal civilized behaviour.

However, in reality this expectation proofs more to be based on wishful thinking as on confirming experience. There is always the famous exception, but in fact, most people who are not kinky themselves tend to show reactions towards BDSM that do display a close conformity to their own set of ethics; and those are likely the sort of ethics that regard BDSM as strange, unfamiliar and scary (or in case of religious bias, even as sin or outright evil).

Now, when we are honest, we have to admit that indeed some of the things we do can look very scary; not only is much of the context of BDSM play aimed at creating some sort of suspense and tension, but also the actions are bewildering to individuals that do not understand the mechanics underlying BDSM play, like how funny pain can be or how our power exchange is (ideally) embedded in a safe, sound and consensual praxis.

However, because they are not understanding, liking or accepting our ‘thing’, this does not automatically render our preferences, urges and actions into something immoral, wrong or sick. From one perspective one could argue for this assessment, from another perspective it is clearly a matter of freedom, liberty and identity. What does actually divide us is our view on what is right. Is there a truth regarding BDSM & LGBTQ and how can we be sure of it?


The Duality of Choosing
To put it from the start, I will not lead you on the slippery path of philosophical theories on truth, nor in the confusing maze of (religious) ethics. There are certainly many things to say and needed to be said in these areas, but at the end it will turn out to be arbitrary anyway. Some will be in agreement with what I argue for, others won’t. Overall, the question will perhaps not be to choose for this or that point of view, but rather why we have to choose and divide at all.

With truth - as in right and wrong - it seems that we can discover a similar diversity as we find in sexual urges and preferences; yes, there is seemingly a binary position we can make with regard to our sex organs (and is the mind one of them or not?), but we also find a pluriformity of options on how to experience our naturally appearing sex in- and outside of our head.

For the majority of our fellow human beings, many common dualisms - like e.g. the male/female distinction - will feel as a natural and logical option. But since we realized that there must be around 50 shades of grey, we discovered that the world is not black and white and that it perhaps has never been; not the world is dualistic, as it seems, but the way we look at the world ultimately creates our (dualistic) experience.

This is a very important distinction, as it shows that you - for yourself, inside of your head or inside a safe circle - can have a full self-awareness and self-acceptation towards your sexual orientation or gender identity. Even when the outside word is hostile and intolerant; you can and may always be you, hidden inside or out in the open.

Luckily the – predominantly post-Christian - world is evolving. A large minority in the West does not regard dualisms and rigid categories as the only valid view on sexuality. As a result we differ with regard to gender issues, we differ in respect to the meaning of the vanilla/kink duality and in BDSM play many of us even differ considerably in what makes it work for us: Diversity - and particularly sexual diversity - appears to be part of the human condition.

From the above it may be obvious that I do not endorse gender binarity, nor in general tend towards a dualistic approach with regard to gender identity, sexual orientation or practical preferences. Instead I advocate a non-dualism, which offers the freedom to accept binarity as the genuine experience of many people as such. However, this is done without setting their praxis or opinion as the (indubitable) norm. Free and open societies do tend to show the multifacetedness of human sexuality, whereas rigid and disclosed societies do not; their truths can only be binary; which brings us back to truth again.


Being true? Reasons for (not) concealing your urges
The ethics of the society you live in, and particularly their ideas with regard to LGTBQ, BDSM and fetish, will greatly contribute to your sense of security. Above all, when it comes to publicly showing that you differ in your gender-identity or sexual preference, compared to what is regarded as mainstream. If general ethics is repressive to your urges and inner being, going against them can be a dangerous endeavour; therefore think before you ‘kink’.

However, morals as such, do not necessarily have to end with the situation that a different view on what is to be regarded as good and acceptable, automatically must lead to a casting out or condemning of everyone that is different. As in any reasonable praxis, an enclosed and tolerant society may simply opt for granting each individual freedom of (gender/sexual) expression, as long as it is not against the laws or against the will of one of the participants.

Just as we, just as Sir Cameron as queer sadist, may enjoy such freedoms, we similarly should be at least sensible for others for having less freedom – seen from our perspective. It may be a nuisance to steadily argue with those who disagree, but at least you should be able to state the rationality of wishing to live your life as you are.

In this regard, it may be fruitful to see if you in your contacts with others can find a common basis with regard to human rights and the rationalization of individual expression. What we have seen above about the connection between dualism and truth, will be important here; as those who make use of a dualist approach often serve themselves from an either/or kind of argument in which you – per definition - are wrong. In my view a sensible advance to counter such contradiction, is the call for evidence and the rationality of their views, after all a belief is nothing but a proposition, whereas self expression is a human trait.

Take care of yourself and protect your rights – Sir Cameron

Corporal punishment? – Why BDSM is very different …

Thursday, June 13, 2013

“Corporal punishment?” is part of the series on BDSM and philosophy


Introduction
If you were one of the readers that made it all through the previous blog ‘Against her will’ - congrats by the way - you will be inclined to think that the major difference between corporal punishment and BDSM will be found in the notion of consent. Not a bad guess, but in this blog I argue for a different approach: one that also may have something to say to hardcore masochists, self-maintenance spankers and all kinds of glossy tops alike.


What is Corporal Punishment?
Corporal punishment (CP) is a type of physical punishment that involves the infliction of bodily pain as retribution for an offence made at home, in school or as a result of a sentence by a court of law. I will spare you the lists of methods (flogging, caning, birching, whipping, or strapping) that can be used for corporal punishment or what body parts can be involved (buttock, back, shoulders, thighs, hand and soles of the feet) as this blog is for your information, not for mental foreplay. Mind you!

It was only recently – and on an evolutionary scale everything that happened since we can write is pretty recent – that corporal punishment was outlawed in most EU countries. However, domestic or educational corporal punishment in one form or another is still practised in most countries of the world, even when the total number is declining due to various international campaigns against CP.

For those who see inflicting pain on a sentient being as an act of ‘evil’, this will be a good thing. But even for those, who distinguish between merely inflicting pain and consensual BDSM, the question remains to what extent inflicting pain is indeed morally justifiable?


Reasons for Pain in Corporal Punishment
In general the reason behind getting a CP is to be found in a forbidden, undesirable or illegal action by the offender. No matter if the CP is being administered by an angry parent, a vicious head of school or a cruel executioner, the purpose is to make clear to the one(s) being punished that something they did or said was not okay and needed to be corrected: as such CP intends to involve aspects of adjustment, retribution, deterrence and education. Perhaps we can simply add this together and say that CP and perhaps many other forms of punishment too, is aimed at altering behaviour.

As such all forms of punishment can be seen as a measure by which we define borders, force a change in behaviour and create an awareness of guilt and responsibility on the part of the wrongdoer. The pain, the shame, the disgrace and the humiliation are all forced upon the punished persons(s) and it hurts them. It does likely not respect their freedom, their rights or their bodily integrity and in most of the cases there is no previous consent, nor is this deemed to be necessary. And unless CP is actually beneficial to a society, a person’s mental growth or self perception, any form of CP is nothing but mere violence.


Differences with Kink
As I have said in the introduction, consent is not the distinguishing issue here, even when it does play a role in the relationship as such. Within a BDSM context CP can of course be used to correct an obstinate bottom, change the subs attitude or prevent certain unwanted actions by the slave. As such the punishment can be seen as a form of discipline and is for certain something that falls under the consensual agreement of the partners.

Yet, the purpose of punishment is correction and in my opinion this is the decisive factor: punishment is by the majority of the sufferers not experienced as sexy or pleasurable - nor meant to be as such - but as real and genuine punishment. It is not an act of love, but one of violence; it violates and hurts. The pain may set loose some typical bodily and mental emotions, but that is not the goal. One could even argue that if the one being punished is starting to enjoy it, the dominant partner perhaps better stops and chooses another, more suited punishment; one that is not a reward.

Pain, however, that in general is applied by the top to the bottom partner, is not aimed at changing behaviour, but rather used for encouraging the bottom to do or get what they actually desire and enjoy. For this reason in the Dominion of Lord Cameron to administer or to receive a naughty spanking, a bitter-sweet BDSM-punishment or a sexually helpful humiliation is quite different from CP. There is no need for offensive behaviour, breaking rules or being disobedient. Pain, discipline or limitation is not given out of anger, frustration or feeling offended, but out of freedom of discipline.


Freedom of Discipline
As with any consensual BDSM act, discipline – or punishment, if you wish – is something that is aimed at fulfilling each others needs by respecting the urges and the borders of the other person in a sane and sound context. Freedom to be a Master or to be a pain pig is a privilege that needs to be honoured. The whole context of offence and punishment is in a way foreign to this.

In the Dominion of Lord Cameron – both in the virtual as in the factual realms – the freedom to discipline is an inherent prerogative of any Master, dominant or top. It denotes a right they can execute without asking or without any other reason than feeling in the mood for it. They use that what is offered to them (with the intention of being taken!). In case of an incidental play, this may precisely be the reason to play, but also in a long term kinky relationship, it simply shows the roles of master and slave, top and bottom, dominant and submissive. It is the bare nature of kinks.

Factually, free discipline does need no other context or pretext than just being those persons who we are; both on the giving as on the receiving end; and in this case, we can be at both ends at the same time; as the we trade energy, power, pain and lust.

And all those roles, you ask? All the chains, intimidation, imposing rules, cages, interrogations, all that punishment equipment that we have borrowed from CP: yes, what about that?

Well, that is all show. The costumes, the role-playing, the poses; they are nothing but the requisites on the wicked stages of the Grande Opera of fetish, kink and leather. We like to create the settings that make our heart beat faster and our genitals aroused. We slip in our (predefined) roles and play the villain or the smitten victim with conviction and passion. The pretext is our being present and our consent as free sexual beings.


Freedom to Serve
This is a delicate thing, my dear readers. As serving someone is not an easy act for any of us: it requires courage, perseverance and a lot of self reflection. We have our self-esteem, our dignity and our natural grace. To lay all that down for another person is a matter of great trust, devotion and often love. To help us getting in that state of mind that we actually start behaving as we deep inside crave for, we take our time, we adapt to the pain, we create a sacred space to play in and we make use of symbols and roles.

For an obedient slave that wishes nothing more than pleasing the Master, a set of rules that cannot be kept is only frustrating. Getting punished for being unable to serve properly is no fun at all. It is neither encouraging, nor helpful. Service should not be enforced on servants, but be expected by those who are being served.

The greatest achievement a Master can pride oneself with – if you have to - is not by forcing a servant, a submissive or a lover to being a slut, a pig, a pervert or a whore. It is rather actually letting them be like that by themselves. Laying bare the heart of a serve and love (and humiliate and discipline) them for it, is not only a complement and a great source of joy to those involved, but moreover, it is the acknowledgement of their sexual identity and that of your own: real people being real.


Use your power wise and with certainty – Sir Cameron